Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Learner Tien vs Trevor Svajda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tien vs Svajda analysis and find out who is favored!
Learner Tien vs Trevor Svajda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tien 1 - 0 Svajda
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tien has won 54.17% of points on his second serve, while Svajda has won 52.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tien, in recent form, has won 54.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Svajda has won 52.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.5% and 35.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tien has saved 68.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Svajda has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tien has won 77.5% of matches played (W/L 31/ 9), with Svajda winning 64% (W/L 16/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tien has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 79% (W/L 11/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Svajda has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Tien has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 4), where as Svajda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.22% of matches (W/L 13/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tien winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tien winning 2 and Svajda winning 1. The last match between Tien and Svajda was at the M25 Austin, 09-11-2023, Second, Hard with Learner Tien getting the victory 6-4 5-7 10-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tien and Svajda have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tien winning 1 times and Svajda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tien winning 0, and Svajda 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tien has played against opponents with an average rank of 111.5 while Svajda has played against players with an average rank of 156.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tien has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Svajda has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tien has converted 57.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Svajda has converted 49.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
439
Rank
421
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
732
Rank
721
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
67% (46-23)
Career Total W/L
61% (17-11)
57% (4-3)
YTD W/L
73% (8-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Learner Tien | Trevor Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:0 | 1:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (48/77) | 64% (46/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (28/48) | 59% (27/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (20/29) | 46% (12/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (33/72) | 38% (29/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 10-1 |
Stats 
Learner Tien
Player
Trevor Svajda
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Learner Tien | Trevor Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (4/3) | 73% (8/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 67% (16/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (87/66) | 56% (125/100) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 80% (8/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:19 | 1:32:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 104.43 | 212.91 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (301/493) | 57% (412/723) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (200/301) | 69% (284/412) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (104/192) | 52% (162/311) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (28/49) | 49% (37/75) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (207/471) | 43% (307/713) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 86% (6/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 70% (7/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 40% (5/2) |
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Learner Tien
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Learner Tien
56%
(
59 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
115)
11
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
31%
(
33 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Marco Trungelliti
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Giovanni Oradini
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Learner Tien
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Giovanni Oradini
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Jacob Fearnley
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
11
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Robert Cash
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Adam Neff
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Trevor Svajda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Samir Banerjee
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Karue Sell
53%
(
52 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Omni Kumar
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Emile Hudd
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Trevor Svajda
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Mitchell Harper
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Trevor Svajda
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
10
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
16 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Trevor Svajda
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tien Vs Svajda Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Learner Tien
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Trevor Svajda
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
